BVI, Caribbeanand International News

US Judge Blocks New York’s Social Media Law Targeting Hate Speech, Cites First Amendment Concerns

US Judge Blocks New York’s Social Media Law Targeting Hate Speech, Cites First Amendment Concerns

A federal judge recently issued a preliminary injunction against a New York state law that implicates hate speech, saying it violates Americans’ constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights.
New York General Business Law Section 394-ccc, also referred to as the Hateful Conduct Law, came into effect on Dec. 3, 2022. It compels platforms to “provide and maintain mechanisms for reporting hateful conduct on their platform.” It also empowers New York’s attorney general to assess a fine of up to $1,000 per day on platforms that don’t comply.

U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter on Feb. 14 blocked the law’s enforcement, pending final judgment in a lawsuit. He determined that the plaintiffs have shown a “likelihood of success” in striking down the law, based on their allegation that the law is unconstitutional under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh and co-plaintiffs—video streaming platform Rumble Canada and creator crowdfunding site Locals Technology—on Dec. 1, 2022, sued New York state in a federal lawsuit, alleging the New York law is illegal and in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First and Fourteenth Amendments, which protect free speech and due process.

In his ruling on Feb. 14, Carter, an Obama appointee, determined that the Hateful Conduct Law is “clearly aimed at regulating speech” and “fundamentally implicates the speech of the networks’ users by mandating a policy and mechanism by which users can complain about other users’ protected speech.”

“[T]he First Amendment protects individuals’ right to engage in hate speech, and the state cannot try to inhibit that right, no matter how unseemly or offensive that speech may be to the general public or the state,” Carter added.

He said that the Hateful Conduct Law’s targeting of certain speech as the state defines it—that which tends to “vilify, humiliate, or incite violence” based on their “race, color, religion, ethnicity, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression”—”clearly implicates the protected speech of social media users.”

“This could have a profound chilling effect on social media users and their protected freedom of expression,” Carter wrote. “Even though the law does not require social media networks to remove ‘hateful conduct’ from their websites and does not impose liability on users for engaging in ‘hateful conduct,’ the state’s targeting and singling out of this type of speech for special measures certainly could make social media users wary about the types of speech they feel free to engage in without facing consequences from the state.”

Law Passed in Wake of Buffalo Shooting
The law was passed by New York’s legislature in June 2022 after a mass shooting in Buffalo in May 2022 that killed 10 black people. The shooting was live-streamed by the killer on the social media platform Twitch.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul subsequently directed Attorney General Letitia James to probe the role of social media platforms in broadcasting the shooting, after which James issued a report that concluded the Buffalo shooter had been “radicalized” by social media platforms. The report also said that “[o]nline platforms should be held accountable for allowing hateful and dangerous content to spread on their platforms.”

“Although preventing and reducing the instances of hate-fueled mass shootings is certainly a compelling governmental interest, the law is not narrowly tailored toward that end,” Carter wrote in his ruling on Feb. 14. “Banning conduct that incites violence is not protected by the First Amendment, but this law goes far beyond that.”

He added: “While the [Office of the Attorney General] Investigative Report does make a link between misinformation on the internet and the radicalization of the Buffalo mass shooter … even if the law was truly aimed at reducing the instances of hate-fueled mass shootings, the law is not narrowly tailored toward reaching that goal.

“It is unclear what, if any, effect a mechanism that allows users to report hateful conduct on social media networks would have on reducing mass shootings, especially when the law does not even require that social media networks affirmatively respond to any complaints of ‘hateful conduct.’ In other words, it is hard to see how the law really changes the status quo—where some social media networks choose to identify and remove hateful content and others do not.”

‘Not Clear’
Carter noted that the law uses vague terms, which exacerbates its chilling effect.

“It is not clear what the terms like ‘vilify’ and ‘humiliate’ mean for the purposes of the law. While it is true that there are readily accessible dictionary definitions of those words, the law does not define what type of ‘conduct’ or ‘speech’ could be encapsulated by them,” according to Carter.

“For example, could a post using the hashtag ‘BlackLivesMatter’ or ‘BlueLivesMatter’ be considered ‘hateful conduct’ under the law?

“Likewise, could social media posts expressing anti-American views be considered conduct that humiliates or vilifies a group based on national origin? It is not clear from the face of the text, and thus the law does not put social media users on notice of what kinds of speech or content is now the target of government regulation.”

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which is representing the plaintiffs, celebrated Carter’s decision.

“For decades, courts have been very clear: States cannot burden the free exchange of ideas, regardless of the ideas’ perceived morality or merit,” FIRE attorney Jay Diaz said in a statement. “What happened in Buffalo broke the nation’s heart, and we are thankful that the killer is being brought to justice. But, as the court recognized, violating expressive rights online won’t make us safer.”

“New York’s vague and overbroad law sought to stifle robust debate on the internet,” FIRE attorney Daniel Ortner said in a statement. He said Carter’s decision was “a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely.”

Volokh said in a statement: “New York tried to single out particular ideological viewpoints by requiring me and other platform operators to have policies for dealing with those viewpoints.

“That’s just as unconstitutional as the government targeting ‘unpatriotic’ speech or anti-police speech or whatever else. I’m grateful that this decision makes clear that such viewpoint-based attempts at government regulation are unconstitutional.”

Related Articles

UK: Humza Yousaf replaces Nicola Sturgeon as SNP leader and first minister in Scotland
In a dramatic U-turn against His Government: Judicial Reform Legislation Must Be Halted, Says Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant
Gordon Moore, a co-founder of Intel Corporation, died at 94
Powell: Silicon Valley Bank was an 'outlier'
Donald Trump arrested – Twitter goes wild with doctored pictures
NYPD is setting up barricades outside Manhattan Criminal Court ahead of Trump arrest.
Credit Suisse's Scandalous History Resulted in an Obvious Collapse - It's time for regulators who fail to do their job to be held accountable and serve as an example by being behind bars.
Home Secretary Suella Braverman tours potential migrant housing in Rwanda as asylum deal remains mired in legal challenges
Paris Rioting vs Macron anti democratic law
'Sexual Fantasy' Assignment At US School Outrages Parents
Credit Suisse to borrow $54 billion from Swiss central bank
Russian Hackers Preparing New Cyber Assault Against Ukraine
Jeremy Hunt insists his Budget will get young parents and over-50s back into work
If this was in Tehran, Moscow or Hong Kong
TRUMP: "Standing before you today, I am the only candidate who can make this promise: I will prevent World War III."
Mexican President Claims Mexico is Safer than the U.S.
A brief banking situation report
Lady bites police officer and gets instantly reaction
We are witnessing widespread bank fails and the president just gave a 5 min speech then walked off camera.
Donald Trump's asked by Tucker Carlson question on if the U.S. should support regime change in Russia?.
Silicon Valley Bank exec was Lehman Brothers CFO
In a potential last-ditch effort, HSBC is considering a rescue deal to save Silicon Valley Bank UK from insolvency
BBC Director General, Tim Davie, has apologized, but not resigned, yet, following the disruption of sports programmes over the weekend
Elon Musk Is Planning To Build A Town In Texas For His Employees
The Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse effect is spreading around the world, affecting startup companies across the globe
City officials in Berlin announced on Thursday that all swimmers at public pools will soon be allowed to swim topless
Fitness scam
Market Chaos as USDC Loses Peg to USD after $3.3 Billion Reserves Held by Silicon Valley Bank Closed.
Senator Tom Cotton: If the Mexican Government Won’t Stop Cartels from Killing Americans, Then U.S. Government Should
Banking regulators close SVB, the largest bank failure since the financial crisis
The unelected UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, an immigrant himself, defends new controversial crackdown on illegal migration
Man’s penis amputated by mistake after he’s wrongly diagnosed with a tumour
In a major snub to Downing Street's Silicon Valley dreams, UK chip giant Arm has dealt a serious blow to the government's economic strategy by opting for a US listing
It's the question on everyone's lips: could a four-day workweek be the future of employment?
Is Gold the Ultimate Safe Haven Asset in Times of Uncertainty?
Spain officials quit over trains that were too wide for tunnels...
Don Lemon, a CNN anchor, has provided a list of five areas that he believes the black community needs to address.
Hello. Here is our news digest from London.
Corruption and Influence Buying Uncovered in International Mainstream Media: Investigation Reveals Growing Disinformation Mercenaries
Givenchy Store in New York Robbed of $50,000 in Merchandise
European MP Clare Daly condemns US attack on Nord Stream
Former U.S. President Carter will spend his remaining time at home and receive hospice care instead of medication
Tucker Carlson called Trump a 'demonic force'
US Joins 15 NATO Nations in Largest Space Data Collection Initiative in History
White House: No ETs over the United States
U.S. Jet Shoots Down Flying Object Over Canada
Being a Tiktoker might be expensive…
SpaceX, the private space exploration company, made a significant breakthrough in their mission to reach space.
China's top tech firms, including Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, NetEase, and JD.com, are developing their own versions of Open AI's AI-powered chatbot, ChatGPT
This shocking picture, showing how terrible is the results of the earthquake in Turkey